Star Trek ’s influence goes way beyond die - concentrated scientific discipline fiction fans . The saga of Starfleet has determine how we think about ethic , morality and the nature of civilization . meter and again , when sit judges reach for a great metaphor , they mention the voyages of the Starship Enterprise .
Here are eight different way that jurist have quote from Star Trek in their rulings , and what we can learn from them .
Jones v. South Jersey Industries , Inc. , 2011 WL 3802243 , 13 ( N.J.Super . A.D. 2011 ) ( The Court is providing a panel instruction to counter any passion aroused by a informant ’s outburst )
“ Your theatrical role is to check fact[s ] . Nobody can enjoin you what to do in that area . That ’s entirely your decision . If you get to the issue of damages , I will instruct you as follows : issue one , you should determine not only that dowery of the case but all [ of ] this portion of the case without using bias or prejudice ; in other words , we want you to be - and I ’m going to see myself a little fleck by say this . Do you remember Star Trek , the original one with Mr. Spock ? Mr. Spock could look at thing all coherent . He was not influenced by passionateness . He certainly was n’t influenced by prejudice , and that ’s … how you need to look at a case . You want to await at a face for the facts as you see them . You need to look at the case for the police force . You enforce the facts to the law , and that ’s how you come up with a decision . You do n’t allow sympathy to recruit into your decision . ”
Jackson v. Harrington , 2011 WL 7143189 , 21 ( C.D.Cal . 2011)(The Court is discussing with a prospective juror the juror ’s ability to be objective )
The court : Yes . I understand . And I ’m worked up . I realise that , too . Were you a fan of Star Trek ? … And you say McCoy , the Dr. who was so emotional who just run off the rampart at the cliff of a hat whenever something aroused would pass . And you had Spock always standing there , placidly not affected at all by the emotion of the situation . And that ’s what we want in this example . We sympathise that it ’s not well-situated . It ’s not easy . But to the extent that you possibly could consecrate yourself to doing exactly that , in other words in being average , you do n’t say , well , I ’ll be sightly to the People . ”
South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries Service , 804 F.Supp.2d 1045 , 1063 ( E.D.Cal . 2011 )
FN5 . Although the court of justice declines plaintiffs ’ invitation to theorise as to whether it is a worse accidental injury for an private Salmon River to be cut by discriminating metallic element sharpness or die on dry land , Pls . ’ Reply Brief 12 , the motor inn will note that in this case the court is most concerned with the survival and recovery of the species , and not the comforter of any item-by-item salmon move its means up the run . Put another path , “ logic intelligibly dictates that the needs of the many overbalance the indigence of the … one . ” Star Trek II ; The Wrath of Khan ( Paramount Pictures 1982 ) .
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. , Inc. , 335 S.W.3d 126 , 162 - 163 ( Tex . 2010 )
Appropriately weighty principles guide our track . First , we spot that police power draws from the creed that “ the needs of the many outbalance the needs of the few . ” Second , while this Sir Hiram Stevens Maxim rings useful and Dickensian ( not to mention Vulcan FN21 ) , it is cabin by something contrarian and Texan : distrust of intrusive government and a notion that police power is justified only by urging , not expediency .
FN21 . See Star Trek II : The Wrath of Khan ( Paramount Pictures 1982 ) . The film references several works of classic lit , none more conspicuously than A Tale of Two Cities . Spock sacrifice Admiral Kirk an passee copy as a natal day present , and the flick itself is bookended with the al-Qur’an ’s scuttle and closing passages . Most memorable , of class , is Spock ’s famous short letter from his bit of forfeiture : “ Do n’t aggrieve , Admiral . It is logical . The pauperization of the many outweigh … ” to which Kirk replies , “ the penury of the few . ”
In re Marriage of Ross , 2007 WL 1632365 , 4 ( Cal . App . 4 Dist . 2007 )
This is also particularly truthful for Calvin ’s controversy , contrary to his argument the California codes are invalid , that the Uniform Commercial Code ( UCC ) is the “ supreme codified law of the planet ” which makes his disjoined title to all property in this dissolution topic superscript to any aim community attribute call . With apologies to the former TV serial Star Trek , we decline “ to boldly go where no [ rational analysis ] has gone before . ” ( Star Trek : Episode Introduction monologue . )
In re Party Masters , Inc. , 1992 WL 106259 , 1 ( Bkrtcy . N.D.Ill . ,1992 )
“ Star Trek ” has been a part of American civilization during the last one-half of the Twentieth Century . To rephrase its illustrious opening lines , this action is the ocean trip of two Star Trek formula booster into litigation before this bankruptcy court ; they explore and flux strange sound theories and ask the Court to look for out judge and do fairness in this lawsuit of their creation ; they boldly go where very few wise litigator have gone before - both parties assert confounding and at odds possibility based on unwritten contract . Like the Star Trek grapheme battle in out space , these parties shinny in the inner emptiness leave behind by their mutual unsuccessful person to indite down and document the term of their agreement .
Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas v. Federal Highway Admin . , 779 F.Supp.2d 542 , 559 ( W.D.Tex . 2011 )
Perhaps Homo sapiens will experience a Darwinian epiphany to take better care of their home before they revert to it . The alternative is a Captain Kirk moment : “ Beam me up , Scotty ! ” FN62
FN62 . “ shine me up , Scotty ! ” is a gimmick musical phrase which made its way into pop culture from the science fiction television series Star Trek . It come from the command Captain Kirk ( played by William Shatner ) open his chief engineer ( played by James Doohan ) . Montgomery “ Scotty ” Scott , when he needs to be enthral back to the Starship Enterprise . James Doohan , Beam Me Up , Scotty : Star Trek ’s Scotty – In His Own Words ( Pocket Books 1996 ) .
Norwood v. Vance 572 F.3d 626 , 630 , 637 ( 9th Cir . 2009 )
( The bulk opinion )
The district court declined to give the proposed instruction because the meaning of deference would not be “ clear to a secular someone . ” But “ deference ” is not Urdu or Klingon ; it is a common English word .
( The objection )
I must , however , notice that the absolute majority is quite right in intuiting that , unsurprisingly , there is no Klingon word for “ compliance . ” See generally Marc Okrand , The Klingon Dictionary ( Star Trek 1992 ) .
County of Westchester v. Town of Greenwich , Conn. 793 F.Supp . 1195 , 1207 -1208 ( S.D.N.Y. 1992 )
We first test the first branch of the easement criteria , the exposed , visible , and adverse requirements for a prescriptive easement . We have no problem close that the County ’s enjoyment of the glide course was heart-to-heart and visible . Aircraft regularly pass overhead during their landings and takeoffs are hard to miss . And suspect have offered no grounds that any Stealth fighters manoeuvre on runway 11/29 or that any of the aircraft used the infamous Romulan cloaking gimmick . FN11
FN11 . For those unfamiliar with with the television series “ Star Trek , ” this reference is to a machine used by a refinement of beings call Romulans which translate their spacecraft invisible to the naked eye .
Faith v. Clark , 2012 WL 2376327 , 14 ( E.D.Cal . 2012 )
THE WITNESS : Dr. Masters , among the forensic community , is considered - basically tantamount to a John F. Kennedy in full term of his integrity , competence and ability . For young folks in the jury , belike that do n’t know about John F. Kennedy , do n’t have the same touch sensation , probably proficient to think of Dr. Masters as Obi Wan Kenobi , which my daughters , the last of the great Jedi warriors depict by Alec [ Guiness ] in Star Trek .
THE tourist court : Star Wars .
THE WITNESS : Star Wars - thank you very much .
Golden Triangle Broadcasting , Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh 483 Pa. 525 , 538 , 397 A.2d 1147 , 1153 ( Pa. 1979 )
As the “ Star Trek ” era is ushered into our living , this Court must be set up to keep its perspectives progressive and its definitions compromising , or else this Commonwealth will go wrong to acquire advanced , technological manufacturing operations .
Screencaps viaTrekcore.com .
This articleoriginally appear over at The Legal Geeks blog . The Legal Geeks are two lawyer blogging about all thing Geek from a lawyer ’s point of eyeshot . They extend everything from Dune to Battlestar Galactica to the Rule Against Perpetuities . you may follow them on Twitter ( @TheLegalGeeks ) and follow Jessica Mederson on Twitter too ( @eDiscMatters )
MoviesStar TrekTelevision
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and finish intelligence in your inbox daily .
intelligence from the time to come , delivered to your present .
Please take your desired newssheet and submit your electronic mail to advance your inbox .
You May Also Like
